Critical Analytical Note

Home » Uncategorized » The Haji Ali Dargah Ruling

The Haji Ali Dargah Ruling

posts by email.

Critical Analytical Note: Critical Analytical Note

Legality of Hyperlinks

Legality of Hyperlinks

I, for one, while writing, picture the intended audience and the beneficiaries (wishful thinking). This article talks about the legality of hyperlinks, taking a leap from trademarks we jump to the next but a slightly tangled trajectory of Intellectual property Law. Copyrights are about ideas, they say ideas are bullet proof but with all my […]

Preliminary decree in partition suit and role of Commissioner

Preliminary decree in partition suit and role of Commissioner

In a partition suit, preliminary decree is passed. An execution petition is filed by the plaintiff before the court. Court allows for it and appoints a commissioner in furtherance of the same. However, objections are filed against the execution of the decree and for the recall of preliminary decree, by the defendant. Court allows for […]

Filing for trademark in India

Filing for trademark in India

In today’s materialistic world where intangible standards of quality such as the goodwill and the brand value of a certain product matter than the tangible quality of the product itself, when the common folk, the youth, dances to the tunes of wakhra swag shunning the idea of running after the brand tags but savagely contradicting […]

Material alterations to a Cheque

Material alterations to a Cheque

We received multiple requests to consider doing a post on material alterations to a Cheque than confining ourselves to just alterations in the signature. In this post we look at various issues that arise out of altering a Cheque…let’s get started! What constitutes material alteration of a Cheque once it has been signed? What changes […]

Cheque bounce Case (Altered presumption of acquittal by sessions court)

Cheque bounce Case (Altered presumption of acquittal by sessions court)

Now let’s alter the presumption. Presumption here is that Sessions court has acquitted the individual after he was convicted by the trial court. In case of acquittal by session court, section 378 of CrPC will come into play. Under sub-section 4, a private individual may by an application made to HC ask for grants special leave […]


The Bombay High Court today decided on the issue of entry of women in the inner sanctum of the Haji Ali Dargah. The Bombay High Court said that the ban violated the constitution as it discriminated against women.

The ban, that was imposed in 2012 by the trust, argued that it was a sin to allow women to touch the tomb of a male saint. Although women were allowed in other parts of the Dargah, the 2012 ban barred them from entering the inner sanctum, which housed the tomb of a Sufi Saint.

A PIL challenging this ban was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by social activists (petitioners in the present case), alleging grounds of gender discrimination and arbitrary denial of access to women in the inner sanctum.

The petitioners state that they are the office bearers of `Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan’ – a national secular autonomous mass movement of Muslim Women with over 50,000 members in 15 States. According to the petitioners, earlier during their visits, they were permitted to enter the inner sanctorum where the saint lied buried, through a separate entry earmarked only for women to enable them to offer prayers. But in June 2012, one of the petitioners discovered a steel barricade put up at the entry of the inner sanctum’s sanctorum, preventing women from entering this part of the mosque. When the petitioner sought reasons for the same from the President of the Haji Ali Dargah, he disclosed the following reasons for imposing such a ban:

  1. women wearing blouses with wide necks bend on the Mazaar, thus showing their breasts;
  2. for the safety and security of women; and
  3. that earlier they were not aware of the provisions of Shariat, and had made a mistake, and therefore had taken steps to rectify the same.

The petitioners approached various state authorities to discuss this matter, but to no avail. Even though the authorities arranged for a meeting between the petitioners and the Haji Ali Dargah Trust, the issue could not be resolved. Aggrieved by the fact, the petitioners filed a PIL in the Bombay High Court, seeking, among other reliefs, an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus and to declare that female devotees have an equal right of entry and access to all parts including the sanctum sanctorum (mazaar) of the Haji Ali Dargah, on par with the male devotees and to restore status quo ante, by permitting female devotees to enter the sanctum’s sanctorum.

The High court decided in favor of the petitioners, stating that the ban barring the women from entering the sanctum’s sanctorum was violative of Article 14 (equality before law within India), Article 15 (prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, caste, sex), Article 19 (1)(d) (to move freely throughout the territory of India) and Article 25 (freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion) of the Indian Constitution.

The ruling, however, doesn’t mean that the women will be allowed to enter the Dargah immediately, as the High Court has granted a stay on the order for six weeks to allow the shrine authorities to appeal to the Supreme Court.

No matter what the Supreme Court decides, this judgment of the High Court paves the way for justice to all and gender equality. According to one of the petitioners, it was a major setback for the patriarchs.

Image Source: Times of India


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: